I was lookng at AA's site and say this dyno chart..
http://www.aatuning.com/dyno/01 330ci vs 01 330ci AA Chip.asp
granted it is for the 330, not the 328.
This blew me away. The other popular mods, intake,exaust and pullys dont have near the increase in power as the chip dyno claims.
13.4 ft*lb of peak torque and the curve is co linear with the unmodified torque curve, so you get more torque at all rpms. this # is at the rear wheels also so the true torque increase at the flywheel may be 16+
that would be the mod of the century in my book considering that a supercharger would cost 18x more and only deliver 4x the torque boost.
So....whats the catch? will this thing make my idle screwy? will it make my engine rattle? will my bumper fall of![[:I]](/images/smilies/icon_smile_blush.gif "Blush [:I]")
It just seems like a no brainer compared to the other mods offered.....also other chippers have much weaker numbers....is AA just better or are they overstating things?
lemme know!
http://www.aatuning.com/dyno/01 330ci vs 01 330ci AA Chip.asp
granted it is for the 330, not the 328.
This blew me away. The other popular mods, intake,exaust and pullys dont have near the increase in power as the chip dyno claims.
13.4 ft*lb of peak torque and the curve is co linear with the unmodified torque curve, so you get more torque at all rpms. this # is at the rear wheels also so the true torque increase at the flywheel may be 16+
that would be the mod of the century in my book considering that a supercharger would cost 18x more and only deliver 4x the torque boost.
So....whats the catch? will this thing make my idle screwy? will it make my engine rattle? will my bumper fall of
It just seems like a no brainer compared to the other mods offered.....also other chippers have much weaker numbers....is AA just better or are they overstating things?
lemme know!